Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:04:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1069067039.3089.4.camel@atari.antcom.de>

Andrew Lau wrote:
> So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
> us for misrepresenting him! = ) 
>
> vbranden?
> vdlegal?
>
> Nominations are now open.

debian-legalint

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
  - From: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@compsoc.dur.ac.uk>
- Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Example of really nasty DD behavior
Next by Date: Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance
Previous by thread: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Next by thread: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread