Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:32:07 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031117073207.GC2773@hezmatt.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031117031453.GA23378@espresso>
References: <[🔎] 20031117031453.GA23378@espresso>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
> us for misrepresenting him! = ) 
> 
> vbranden?

I like this one.  Guardian of the Debian Freedoms.  <g>

- Matt

Reply to:

References:
- Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
  - From: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Programming first steps.
Next by Date: Re: Debian Enterprise?
Previous by thread: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Next by thread: Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread