Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes:

> On Nov 15, Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> wrote:
> 
>  >Another point is do we really want an arch/port to be maintained by only
>  >one person? IMHO there should be at least two people capable and
>  >actually running the buildds for each arch, possibly more when they are
>  >too busy with other things as appears the case with Ryan.
> I fully agree. If a port has not enough developers to care about it,
> then it should not be considered a candidate for releases.

There is a difference between available/existing and responcible.

In this case developer who want to help out with hardware and time are
put down by one power hungry (no offence ment, don't even know who you
are, exagerated to make a point) DD who is blocking any help offered.

MfG
        Goswin

PS: realy no offence ment, I just wish other archs where as friendly and open ad the m68k buildd community