Re: Changes in t1lib.
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:48:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and
> > s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
> Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in Policy, just
> recommendation. There are many other packages which do not conform to 8.1,
> like: e2fslibs, svgalib, zlib, imlib, aalib, beecrypt, slang, cracklib...
> Should I go on?
For the record, I intend to change binary package names for svgalib,
after sarge or once I package 1.9.x for experimental....