Re: vrms and contrib installers (was: Re: "non-free" software included in contrib)
> > I think that, at least, these installer, to be included in debian,
> > should be forced to build a real debian package for this non-free
> > software, when installing it.
> the ones that i am familir with do exactly that. i cannot speak for all
> of them, though.
If they all works this way, there no big bug, they just have make sure
the packages will be correctly listed as non-free.
I checked at least flashplayer-nonfree and it does not seem to build
any debian package at all. In fact, you have a ruby script that do
what dpkg and apt-get would be doing if flashplayer was debian
Not a native english speaker: