On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:41:40PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 01:42, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > * Teófilo Ruiz Suárez > > > > | What about Apache? Should we change the apache2 package to apache? > > No. (Wearing apache & apache2 maintainer hat.) > What are the criteria for the apache package to become Apache 2? Having working ports of a reasonable number of the widely used Apache module packages might be a good start. (E.g., there are no packages today for php4 under Apache2, and if there were, much functionality would be missing due to thread-safe issues with php upstream.) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpt9JAQPtJ6q.pgp
Description: PGP signature