Re: Ideas about allowing Co-maintainer
* Nicolas Bertolissio (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030814 13:20]:
> Le jeudi 14 août 2003, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt écrit :
> > In most cases, this "accepted way" leads to no change in the package and
> > is only frustrating for the submitter of the patch and Goswin's proposal
> > addresses such cases. I like the idea a lot  and am sure that this
> > will improve the overall quality of Debian.
> An NMU can then be done if the package maintainer does not answer to
> this patch. So you don't need to have a co-maintainer, you just have to
> make a NMU, which is just what the new co-maintainer would do.
Would you sponsor Marc, Goswin or myself for a NMU? Would you sponsor
for a co-maintainer upload? That's the important difference.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C