Re: lib?saxon-java [was: Re: Bug#204658: ITP: develock -- additional font-lock keywords for the developers]
Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > This is still a mistake then :-) (I think I misused packages.d.o :-)
> > It should clearly be renamed.
> From: Juan Alvarez <email@example.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:03:01 -0500
> Package: lib-saxon-java
> Version: 6.4.4-1
> The package should be renamed to libsaxon-java to complain the current
> java policy.
> Resolved by the patch I attached (with new upstream and so):
> libsaxon-java (6.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
I'm trying to understand: according to the description, saxon is a collection
of tools, not a collection of libraries.
If so, lib-saxon-java should be renamed to saxon (we don't care if it was
written in java); that was Michael's point.
Otherwise, the description is wrong and must be changed accordingly.