Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:14:08PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:37:32 -0400
> Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> wrote:
> > What you meant to do was to run "make CC=gcc-2.95" instead of make. There
> > is no need to futz around with the default gcc version; just ask for what
> > you want.
> Uh, no. I am aware of that. That, however, did not prevent it from
> running the wrong GCC.
Works fine for me.
*** End of Linux kernel configuration.
*** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuration.
*** Next, you must run 'make dep'.
mizar:[.../linux/kernel-source-2.4.21] make CC=gcc-2.95
make: Entering directory `/space/tmp/mdz/linux/kernel-source-2.4.21/arch/i386/boot'
make: Nothing to be done for `dep'.
make: Leaving directory `/space/tmp/mdz/linux/kernel-source-2.4.21/arch/i386/boot'
rm -f .depend .hdepend
make _sfdep_kernel _sfdep_drivers _sfdep_mm _sfdep_fs _sfdep_net _sfdep_ipc _sfdep_lib _sfdep_crypto _sfdep_arch/i386/kernel _sfdep_arch/i386/mm _sfdep_arch/i386/lib _FASTDEP_ALL_SUB_DIRS="kernel drivers mm fs net ipc lib crypto arch/i386/kernel arch/i386/mm arch/i386/lib"
make: Entering directory `/space/tmp/mdz/linux/kernel-source-2.4.21'
make -C kernel fastdep
make: Entering directory `/space/tmp/mdz/linux/kernel-source-2.4.21/kernel'
gcc-2.95 -D__KERNEL__ -I/space/tmp/mdz/linux/kernel-source-2.4.21/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -E -D__GENKSYMS__ signal.c
Yes, I know that's 2.4.21, but I'm not going to unpack a whole 2.4.20 tree
to demonstrate that it works the same way. It does.
> v2.4.21 of the kernel had a problem with 3.3. It would die repeatedly on
> the same line in ide-cd.h. I did tell make to use gcc-2.95 and it failed
> on the exact same line. Removing gcc, which is 3.3, gcc-2.95 which
> depended on 3.3 (this is NOT 2.95 in my eyes) and then installing the
> packages from woody did allow me to recompile that version of the kernel.
gcc-2.95 doesn't depend on 3.3; it depends on the "gcc" package, which
happens to be version 3.3 in unstable. That package doesn't contain any
compilers; it just sets the default compiler and related tools, e.g.
> I fail to see how 2.95 installing 3.3 somehow equates to 2.95.