Re: removing the "draft" from the DDP policy
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I am still wating for Adam patches (it's been a while). However, I do not
> want to change it from a draft into a official policy. I just want to add
> it to the DDP website documentation and mark it _there_ as a draft. The
> fact that it's not even listed in the DDP website reduces it usefulness.
That's fine with me.
> So, I was basicly asking (probably wrongly worded) to:
> a) add a link to the draft from w.d.o/doc/ddp (currently hidden under
> b) add it to the list of developers' manuals (w.d.o/doc/index and
> Of course, I'm not going to change it's status. It will still be called a
> 'draft' but it will be given wider exposure. Few people (as demonstrated by
> the discussion at -devel and the fact that people at -legal are not aware
> of the license section) are aware that we are drafting a policy for
> documentation in the Debian project.
Seems ok to me.
> > Did Adam indicated he stopped doing rewrite of ddp-policy? Did I miss
> > something? (Sorry for my long absense from email@example.com)
> No he did not, but still, there have been few updates of the document
> itself (and I did tell Adam to go ahead and hack it as needed)
I've been working on a branch of it actually.
I had serious problems with the *scope* of the policy -- it seemed to
be more extensive and detailed in places than it needed to be.
I have a pretty bad backlog of stuff going on right now.
...Adam Di Carlo...<firstname.lastname@example.org>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>