On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 07:33:50AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2003, James Troup wrote: > > > c) just because we've done something wrong in the past doesn't mean we > > can't correct that mistake now, e.g. by your reasoning we shouldn't > > be fixing the SSL vs. GPL violations because "ftpmaster > > implemented[sic] it in the past". > I see no connection between my request for just documenting reasonable things > and this fact. Please explain. The FTP admin team has traditions regarding documentation of their processes as well. You might find: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no\&bug=150392 instructive. If that tradition is being respected, then you are probably expected to document the "cut-off limit for -doc packages" yourself. But, who knows, maybe things have changed; it's been almost a year. -- G. Branden Robinson | A celibate clergy is an especially Debian GNU/Linux | good idea, because it tends to branden@debian.org | suppress any hereditary propensity http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | toward fanaticism. -- Carl Sagan
Attachment:
pgpsRJ8zh8uQa.pgp
Description: PGP signature