Re: stop the "manage with debconf" madness
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:21:59 +0100, Matt Ryan <mryan@debian.org> said:
> All I have said to date is that the overwrite question was suggested
> in the past by another developer as a way of dealing with the
> problem when it came up before. Some of us implemented the
> suggestion and it seems no one has had a problem with it until now
> (I have had no bug reports on this). There are other suggestions now
> that may accomplish the same thing (though I don't like the XML or
> UCF stuff as they add dependencies) and when the dust has settled
> I'm sure I will implement the recommendation put forward.
There were serious bugs filed on TeTeX about this, so the
statement that there were no bugs or complaints is not correct.
Why do you need to wait until dust settles to stop violating policy?
manoj
--
A diplomat is man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never
her age. Robert Frost
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: