Re: Proposed handling of generated configuration files (Re: stop the "manage with debconf" madness)
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 19:33:21 -0400,
>> Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> said:
> As was explained in detail, in order to do anything useful with
> that information, it is necessary to be able to show the user the
> proposed changes to the configuration file. It is completely
> unhelpful to say:
> "You have modified this configuration file, and it has also been
> updated by the package maintainer. Do you want to replace it with
> the version provided by the package maintainer?"
> Without showing the user the new version.
Hmm. ucf does show the user the changes, and even offers to
merge maintainer changes into the current configuration file.
What functionality do you think ucf is missing?
quit When the quit statement is read, the bc processor is terminated,
regardless of where the quit state- ment is found. For example, "if
(0 == 1) quit" will cause bc to terminate. (Seen in the manpage for
"bc". Note the "if" statement's logic)
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C