Re: glibc bugs
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:52:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:59:58PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > Since I woundered why glibc doesn't move to testing I've looked at the
> > bugs if I could help. But than I woundered even more that these
> > licensing differences can't be solved within 85 days. Can these 2
> > serious bugs somehow fixed, downgraded or closed?
> They are de facto downgraded by their set of tags. The real problem with
> glibc are other things, like those listed at the update_excuses page
> (excerpt available from glibc PTS web page).
Said excerpt lists two excuses:
1. "taking my time about glibc", which I assume is a manual override, and
2. glibc (source) is buggy! (2 > 0)
So it would seem that these bugs are not being disregarded (even if they are
not the only barrier).