Re: "testing" improvements
Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:48:28PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
>> En r?ponse ? Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com>:
>> > What is your point exactly? That people use testing to get newer
>> > packages,
>> > so we should force newer packages into testing despite its purpose?
>> Force packages into testing? You must have missed the point.
>> I said let packages into testing for architectures where nothing
>> prevent them to. Why would mipsel failures block x86 packages,
>> for instance?
> Because testing is meant to be releasable, and releasing with packages out
> of sync across architectures is insane?
I didn't say releasing with packages out of sync. Please read my
reply to John.