On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:20:00AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:13:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > >Mike, when did it become appropriate for someone who does absolutely no > >work on a subproject to start speaking on behalf of it? > When is it inappropriate to make a simple observation? Mike, over the past few months you've been taking every opportunity to deride testing whether in concept or implementation. > If I've made an error there, > go ahead and correct it. If not, I don't see your problem. I don't have the time nor the inclination to correct unfounded and malicious claims; you're welcome to express your opinion about testing being a useless failure, and a waste of bandwidth and time to boot, but unless you're going to start helping fix the problems you encounter sometime soon, please do so in a blog rather than on the development list. For reference, the claim you asserted was a ``fantasy idea'' was ``RC bugs happen on testing [..] but on a less frequent basis [than unstable]'', which is entirely true, even right now. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpODsqNLtB9_.pgp
Description: PGP signature