Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
>>>>> In article <20030214100843.GC1208@krikkit.ukeer.de>, Rico -mc- Gloeckner <email@example.com> writes:
> What loss will it be for the *users* if micq is removed from debian
> just because upstream and maintainer were both too stubborn to
> lower their ego for a little while and instead focus on users need?
When a package is not available, I can look for
alternatives. I won't install micq, and rely on it to work, and
suddenly discover it won't.
Some shops use instant messaging for real work.
I've got a bad feeling about this.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C