Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030214125101.GH1208@krikkit.ukeer.de>, Rico -mc- Gloeckner <mc@ukeer.de> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:10:03AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Why does it bother you so much that a program whose author has
>> demonstrated such animosity toward the project should be removed?
>> We
> Well, basically i feel bound to micq. I use micq for quite some
> time, i did keep the project "alife" for about one year (the time
> between matthews car accident and ruedigers entry into the project)
> and i still do the background tech stuff around micq.org.
I see. Figures. What is it about micq authors that they have
no concept of security, and that one never brings in innocent end
users into a technical disagreement, and that a denial of service
attack is a bad thing?
manoj
--
You can always tell the people that are forging the new
frontier. They're the ones with arrows sticking out of their backs.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: