On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 17:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > Does the gcc 3.2 transition constitute a major enough change? How about > > the inclusion of d-i? KDE 3.1? GNOME 2? Linux 2.4? > > Since Linux 2.4 was included in woody (despite claims by the popular press > to the contrary), I'd say that is definitely not a major change. > Oops, I did of course mean "default", which I believe is the plan. But you knew that :) Scott -- Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part