Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)

To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Cc: Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:49:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021112154953.GA15463@dat.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021112152042.GB21912@wile.excelhustler.com>
References: <[🔎] 20021112143711.GA6850@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 20021113020355.5e370f2f.bug1@optushome.com.au> <[🔎] 20021112152042.GB21912@wile.excelhustler.com>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:20:42AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> 
> This is already done and available in the debsigs package that I wrote for
> Progeny (now maintained by Branden, it looks like).  What's all this wheel
> reinventing?
> 
	I wasn't proposing reimplemeting debsigs. I'm just proposing we
make it 'standard' in Debian. (this would probably make 'gpg' standard too
BTW).

	Regards

	Javi

Reply to:

References:
- [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au>
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by Date: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by thread: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread