on Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 10:58:17PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote about Re: Dock Apps packaging: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 09:36:07PM +0200, Frank Lenaerts wrote: > > > > (1) developer perspective: having the finest possible granularity is > > best for maintenance purposes > > > > (2) user perspective: ease of selecting things: it might indeed be > > more difficult to select some little apps from a large list, but > > with things like the task packages, meta packages bundling > > together things to ease selection, this should not be a problem > > anymore > > > > To conclude, I would choose to have things packaged separately and > > have other packages to group packages that are often used together. > > Like a meta package? > > Just create "dockapps-net" which depends on all the net-related > packages. Or separated for popularity as dockapp-popular or > whatever. Yes indeed. > J > > -- > Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland. > http://www.HispaLinux.es/~data/ | data.pandacrew.org > ------------------------------------------------------ > Please, encrypt mail address to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69 > FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 > ------------------------------------------------------ > Registered Linux user #66350 Debian 3.0 & Linux 2.4.19 > > It's called a change-over. The movie goes on and nobody knows the > difference. > --Narrator (Fight club) -- lenaerts.frank@pandora.be Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." -- Henry Spencer
Attachment:
pgpqL_QPNgGbC.pgp
Description: PGP signature