Re: [ Request for Help ] Re: BTS improvements (was: Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
Adam> This is correct. I'm not asking for incremental fixes to the
Adam> existing code base.
Adam> I want to start out with a completely fresh system, that has
Adam> all the same features as the current one, has the same
Adam> interface, but ends up being easier to maintain and program.
Hmm. As an exercise, I've started to put togther a UML use
case document for the BTS, and I'll try and document all the use
cases we already have.
Lets see if this formal design stuff really works in a free
software world ;-)
manoj
--
"My husband said it was him or the cat ... I miss him sometimes."
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: