On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:47:49PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > If high priorities were available to the security team only, then that's a > different issue, but discouraging ordinary subscribers and especially > non-subscribed random posters from using Priority: High on a community > list (me! me! me! I want help first!) is a very good thing, IMHO. > And considering that Priority: High has a certain but limited spam > correlation on such lists, it's as useful (when used with care) as any > other item with such a correlation. I would say there is a very high correlation between what I consider junk email, and what is sent with a high priority. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpZBUbxKW0on.pgp
Description: PGP signature