Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 16.46 schrieb Russell Coker: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 22:43, Russell Coker wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:29, Christoph Martin wrote: > > > In http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-nexttime.html it says that work on > > > RSBAC support in Debian is in progress. I have not seen any discussion > > > of it on the list. However there is an RFP: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=157916 > > > > > > Is anybody working on this? > > > > I have built some kernel packages for RSBAC and put them online on > > http://www.coker.com.au/rsbac/ . > > > > Please check them out, if people think that they are OK then I'll upload > > them. > > I have not received any email response to this message and I conclude that > there is no significant interest in using RSBAC in Debian at the moment. > > I will not do any more work on RSBAC at the moment for this reason and because > I believe that RSBAC is overly complex to use. Sorry for not answering before. I was interested to have RSBAC in Debian, but I have no time to work on it at the moment. I would have tried it on one of my firewall machines, but I also think that it is to complex to get it running without a lot of time of experimenting. My original issue was to make my Debian boxes more secure and I found some information about RSBAC which sounded really good. But perhaps I should try SE Linux instead. Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil