Re: 3.2 transition
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
-snip-
> There still seem to be a lot of kernel people who don't trust 3.2; now
> whether that is a kernel issue or a gcc issue is very difficult to tell
> - my personal guess is that it is a bit of both. Definitly 2.95.x is
> still the recommended kernel compiler for most architectures - a pity
> given the improvements 3.2.x has made in many places.
This is usually due to the kernel being written to the compilers bugs,
or has been in the past.
Chris
Reply to: