Re: DAK (2)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> 1. For package installations, DAK will inform both the uploader and the
> maintainer. For private archives should it inform the maintainer?
> Maybe a message "Your package has been installed in the private
> archive at http://.../ and has SE-Linux support" might be good, and
> clearly indicates that the package maintainer doesn't have to panick
> about a non-authorised version being uploaded to Debian.
>
> 2. Where is the code that moves unstable to testing? That does not
> appear to be here?
>
> 3. Could the information in apt.conf be automatically generated from
> kate.conf? It seems very much like apt.conf just duplicates
> a lot of information in the Suite section of kate.conf, and I dislike
> duplicating config information (it increases the chances of a
> mismatch).
>
> 4. When installing a new package (with lisa I think), how do you specify
> with component {main,contrib,non-free} it will go into?
>
5. What is the dsync-flist used by mkchecksums, and where can I get it
from? Google search returns nothing.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: