Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cc: "Robert C." <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!
- From: Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:47:44 -0500
- Message-id: <20021117054744.GZ18181@mizar.alcor.net>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com, "Robert C." <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <20021117053202.GH25583@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
- References: <3DD6CA82.email@example.com> <20021116230850.GP18181@mizar.alcor.net> <20021117053202.GH25583@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:32:05PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 06:08:50PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Most of these (like the path, logfile and UID/GID limits) seem perfectly
> > reasonable. However, things like DOC_ROOT and HTTP_USER and USERDIR_SUFFIX
> > (which are configurable in the Apache httpd configuration) seem like they
> > belong in a configuration file.
> Actually, the GID and UID settings don't seem particularly sane to me; I
> would expect these to both be set to 1000, since that's where system
> accounts end per Debian policy.
They might not be a perfect fit for Debian, but they're sane (they should