Re: the netbase/inetd conspiracy
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:47:18AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Why not treat this as the bug it really is, and fix the packages that are
> > buggy?
> Because it's not a bug, the packages aren't buggy, and it doesn't actually
It is, either in the packages, or in policy. I don't really care which one
we change, but we should reword policy to say "conffile" instead of
configuration file, then.
> Why not stop wasting my time on something so utterly pointless? (seriously)
Who's wasting *your* time? I certainly did not Cc or otherwise mention you,
and this concerns one of my packages as well (even if it is a package I want
someone else to adopt ASAP).
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot