Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 02:12:01PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The problem is: rpath looks like the standard, simple answer to the problem,
> while it actually has a lot of side-effects that are not really desirable
> (and not obvious, either).
Could you elaborate on the side effects? Every time rpath comes up
the discussion is not very productive. It would be nice to have a
place where the pros and cons (and future solutions) are listed so the
discussion can start from some place rational.
James (Jay) Treacy
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com