Re: Editor Priorities
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:27:07PM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net> [020508 15:20]:
> > begin Wichert Akkerman quotation:
> > > Previously m@moshez.org wrote:
> > > > * Not free -200
> > >
> > > I still disagree with that one. We are talking about an index of the
> > > usefulness of an editor, not its license. That is a completely seperate
> > > issue.
> >
> > I violently agree with Wichert. [...]
>
> What John Robinson said: non-free wouldn't be an option for something
> that gets installed on ALL systems.
The alternative priorities really have nothing to do with what gets
installed on all systems.
> While the scores may be skewed one way or the other, we are talking
> about DFSG free software.
No, we're talking about the priorities of the various editors packaged
for Debian, and what should become the default editor *when installed* -
manually if necessary.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: