Re: The new way of closing bugs (dinstall)
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:20:31PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:35:41AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > closed bugs)? If so, that seems to neatly eliminate most of the
> > > arguments for adding such a state -- if bug submitters already aren't
> > > looking down at the bottom of the page for relevant bugs, how will
> > > adding a new category help?
> > Because it would have a new section in the BTS Web page. What's
> > the problem?
> The most recent request for this stated that they wanted it because it's
> a hassle to read all the way down the BTS web page to look at bugs
> reported as 'closed'. Are these people really going to read down to the
Well, what I do know is that I want the new section because I will be able
to know just what the hell is happening without opening the full bug report.
Heck, I'd be very happy with pending+fixed tags, followed by a close when
the package enters the archive, no need for any new sections in the BTS web
page as far as I'm concerned.
So can we please have that feature to ease the life of the people who do
work with the BTS, and stop bothering with the lazy asses that don't do it
now (and probably won't do it no matter what we do to the BTS anyway)?
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org