Re: New Package Developer
* Michael Weber
| I decided in favor of a more complicated Depends line at that time,
| but if (despite of keeping all the above in mind) there is a
| convincing argument for a name-versioned package, please speak up. :)
Make the package provide ghc5.02.2 and have packages depend on that?
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
: :' :
Unix IS user friendly... It's just `. `'
selective about who its friends are. `-
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com