Re: ITP: mencal -- A menstruation calendar
> I understand that there is a fine difference b/w something that is
> useless and might be useful but lets be resonable here. Is it fine to
> package something like an application that will play a sound file
> at the top of the hour?? I would find that very much useless as there
> are many ways of doing that without adding more packages to the archive.
>
> Someone before said that for a package to be included in Debian, x
> number of DD should vote for it so it's accepted. With this ITP, I think
> that the voting become much more popular to me.
>
> Anyway, this should _not_ be a seperate package - maybe they should add it
> as another built-in app into Emacs :)
ObReply:
Or in the real world it might be a patch to gcal, so gcal can be
extended as a 'really nifty' calendar package.
Peter 'darke' Crystal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: