Philip Blundell <firstname.lastname@example.org> cum veritate scripsit:
> On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 14:21, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Also, it allows different development libraries, I believe
> > with libusb-0.1.so.4, you can link in libraries with "-lusb-0.1"
> > and it can coexist easily with "libusb-0.2" which may be sourcewise
> > very incompatible.
> That's kind of a different issue. To make "-lusb-0.1" work, all you
> need is some file called libusb-0.1.so. You could still use
> "libusb.so.4" as the soname; the two don't have to bear any relation at
> all to one another.
However it would be nice to have the luxury of knowing the
development library name from the runtime library.
It also depends on how one likes/dislikes libtool...
email@example.com : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4