On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:11:44AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > >Either way, I don't see how this could be a security hole > >justifying any bug report higher than 'minor'. > It would justify more than minor, but in the security > scanner --- not in ssh. Very true. > I'd just worry that existing network audits will be thrown off > by changing the version. I _do_ think we should change the > version when we release a security fix, though. Or when we make > major changes (not sure if we do for ssh). That's pretty much it in a nutshell. Will you (or someone else) be submitting a bugreport against ssh to that effect? -- =========================================================== Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 4th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. ===========================================================
Attachment:
pgpfDAR5yO5Y0.pgp
Description: PGP signature