Re: [kde] setting an /opt precedent, a twist
In that case, wouldn't most non-free software really fit better in /opt?
On 17 Jan 2002, Mikael Hedin wrote:
>By FHS, /opt is for add-on software, i.e. not for the
>vendor/distribution/whateveryoucallit. If he (as a person, not as a
>part of Debian) wants to distribut kde3 as an independent thing, it
>could go in /opt, but not as a part of Debian.
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? email@example.com