Re: bogus maintainers?
* Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2002-01-03 21:06]:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> What I meant was: the page was apparently generated from local data
>> (from a local /var/lib/dpkg/available perhaps?).
> And I said it _was not_.
> The broken package really was in sid, my few-days-old sid still has it.
> It's been fixed in the meantime. The devel/people page will be regenerated
And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you
get from debian archive. The info was in that file, too. It was a
(two) broken uploads that shouldn't have happened. But hey - that's
unstable. What would it be like if unstable wouldn't make up for his
I tracked one of the packages down (apt-get source helps) and found
Martin Schulze as the responsible person. But that was quite some
days (weeks?) ago - are those package-pages still online or were your
report lagging behind?
[It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time.