Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 22:07:20 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011230220720.D22963@fisch.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011228022457.GA3695@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 01122720085101.00793@tau> <[🔎] 20011228022457.GA3695@kitenet.net>

* Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> [20011227 21:24]:
> I also notice someone (you?) did a binary NMU of it for s390. Fixing
> this problem?

AFAIK the binary NMU was done because s390 had toolchain problems at
some point.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@swol.de>
- Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: NMU sclient
Next by Date: Re: my.debian.org
Previous by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Next by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread