Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:15:30PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> I'm maintaining dietlibc already so there's no need to worry about that.
> Also, dietlibc IS a lot smaller than glibc so it is definitely an option.
>
> Although Hurd is not supported, ARM, Sparc, PowerPC, i386, etc is all
> supported. Also busybox et al works fine with it.
But have you actually tried BUILDING it on PowerPC? :) Take a look at
it on voltaire sometime.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: