Re: Darwin Streaming Server
Adam Majer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The problem is Debian does not have a definition of free. It is a
> guideline only. This is something someone here pointed out to me. I
> think that Debian needs a solid definition so that there is no
> ambiguity of where what software goes. For instance, see the
> licensing problems with gnuplot. [in bugs]. And it is clear from the
> copyright of gnuplot that it should be under Other licenses.
You seem to be saying you want a rule that would require neither
thought nor judgment to apply. Perhaps that would be a good idea if
we lacked thought and judgment. But when that day comes, we won't
have a distributing worth crap either, since that also takes thought
There is no good reason to box ourselves in unnecessarily.