Re: Read-only /usr
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 10:03:49PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > We should better use the source to dpkg to do that.
>
> Adam Heath has categorically vetoed this on the grounds that the only
> person who cannot remount a filesystem readonly when there are busy
> inodes pending deletion is me[1].
I never vetoed it. I said I wouldn't do it. Stop puttin words in my mouth.
> (He hasn't "seen" any "actual problems" using a readonly /usr
> partition.)
I said "I have heard of no one other than you who has had problems with
remounting /usr ro". Stop putting words in my mouth.
ps: I wonder why Branden is rewriting history(last night on irc), to fit his
own view.
Reply to: