Re: RFC: Changes to apache-perl
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 12:57:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [Replies to me or -devel, please, I don't read -user]
>
> I've had a bug open Forever on apache-perl asking it to coexist with Apache;
> I'm about to build packages that do so. As a result, though, I need to move
> its configuration somewhere else, move its default logs somewhere else, find
> it another port, etc. My current plan is to include a debconf note saying
> that it has moved, include an example configuration only, and not start it by
> default on any port.
I don't understand the benefit of the ProxyPass setup you describe. Care to
elablorate? I haven't seen a port clause in a URL for a long time, are there
any other reasons for this?
(For the lazy, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56591)
--
Jacob Kuntz
http://www.lucidpark.net/
Reply to: