Re: FYI: intent to NMU to fix SDL + static X extension library problem
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I struggled to come up with a name that would make it clear that what we
> have is really libsd1.2, and not some fork or beta version. That's
> almost impossible to do, but I settled on "libsdl1.2debian". Yes, I
> know, it sucks, but keep in mind that we're in this fix in the first
> place because we *ALREADY* forked the SDL library to include the static
> X extension libraries -- on half of our architectures.
Are any commercial programs dynamically linked against libsdl1.2? I know
that e.g. many popular games that run under Linux use SDL.
Get my GPG key: finger email@example.com | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400