Re: new port: and the winner is....
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:42:31AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The point being? We do not have to waste time with that now, at least not
> with the kernel. We still need not to get too trigger happy with hardware
> and firmware, but otherwise...
>
> I won't help a Microsoft windows port. I expect a lot of others not to. It
> does not mean I'll lose my time trying to block such a port, but I *will*
> take time to stop such a port from tainting the Debian name (if someone
> pushes for it to become an officially supported port in the archive) UNTIL
> there is a DFSG-compliant kernel for it to run on top of.
Hmmm..., anybody considering a port to one of the FreeDOS arch's?
(there may only be one, but I can't remember anymore)
There are debian packages out there for commercial X servers after all...
Reply to: