On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:07:14PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Of course, it looks like either (a) Linux's fs caches have much better > > complexity, as long as you've got the RAM to use them, or (b) the > > huge jump in master's specs (thanks HP! :) has made the performance > > problems pretty trivial. Either way, the indices are only taking about > > 14s to generate from scratch atm, so we'll be making them happen a lot > > more often. For reference, they're now at every 30mins, down from every > > four hours. > How long did it take on the old master? IIRC, around 5mins of CPU time, maybe 20mins of real time. I don't really remember though. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpgMHZVxsUEv.pgp
Description: PGP signature