Re: Official KDevelop packages for Debian
(not subbed to debian-kde, removed)
Since the CVS sources are working toward a more stable release with bugs
in 2.0beta1 fixed, I'm for tracking CVS.
Cheers,
dtc
---
Dan Chen crimsun@email.unc.edu
GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Norman Jordan wrote:
> I would like a second opinion on whether I should use CVS sources or the 2.0beta1 release for KDevelop. Currently the CVS branch I am packaging is working towards the 2.0 release and is only accepting patches after review. Various bugs, including crashes have been fixed in CVS.
>
> Should I stick to the 2.0beta1 release or use current CVS sources?
Reply to: