[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Do the HPPA "binary-only" NMUs violate the GPL?



>there are currently many "binary-only" NMUs for HPPA that change the
>source of the package. E.g.
>
> clif (0.93-1.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>   * va_arg fixes for gcc 2.96 and later.  See #103683

This is certainly in poor taste.  If the HPPA people can't wait for the 
maintainer to turn around a new package, they should do a source NMU - it's 
scarcely much more work than a binary-only upload.  Like any other, this rule 
is made to be broken, but one shouldn't make a habit of it.

p.


Attachment: pgpbAlQo43vkE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: