Re: Still don't understand update excuses
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:56:49AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> I still don't quite understand the update excuses, I'm afraid. Take for
> example the following entry (shortened):
>
> * inform 6.21-2 (currently 6.21-1) (optional) (low)
> + out of date on [248]sparc: inform (from 6.21-1)
> + there are up to date bins in sparc also
> + not considered
>
> It is out of date, but up to date bins exist? What does that mean? What
> is the remedy? The package does not depend on anything except libc6.
> It's in non-free, but other packages are in non-free as well and do
> enter testing anyway.
You produce a binary-all and a binary-arch package, probably. Some but
not all of the binaries produced from that source are current for
sparc. Try building it on vore?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: