Re: [RFU] drscheme
* tbm <tbm@cyrius.com> [20010619 22:18]:
> So, rscheme is a PITA to build, keeps a package which should be
> removed from removal and has issues on SPARC... what does rscheme
> offer that bigloo doesn't have? i.e. is there a good reason to
> keep rscheme or could we remove it (and upload it again when/if
> upstream sorts out these issues).
Actually, this is a dumb idea because rscheme was in stable.
So, how can rscheme be fixed? Can you talk to upstream again,
Matthew?
Reply to: