Re: GCC 3.0 status?
Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> We can't use it for woody, since switching to g++ 3.0 means breaking
> the ABI and will force us to change to sonames on all C++ libraries.
That means that stable will probably be stuck with an old and
not-very-compliant C++ compiler for a long time. Are we sure we want
to live with that?
Telling people who want a compliant C++ compiler that they have to use
unstable, or install g++-3.0 and recompile all their C++ libraries, or
switch to another distribution doesn't sound good to me.
Unless I'm missing something, and it would be easier for users than
Alan Shutko <email@example.com> - In a variety of flavors!
About all some men accomplish in life is to send a son to Harvard.